Medical diagnosis is a difficult task that combines intellectual and intuitive skills.
Well-defined diseases with structural changes in tissues are the easiest diagnose. Because
we rely a lot on pictures, mass lesions such as tumors and tissue distortions from
infection and injury are the easiest to visualize and diagnose. However, most common
health problems that physicians see every day cannot be visualized and remain in a curious
limbo. More and more people are entering this limbo every day and there is increasing
disenchantment with a medical system that has a hard time recognizing illnesses that you
cannot see or measure by simple tests.
The catch in the scholarly enterprise of reviewing medical practice is that medical
knowledge is imperfect at best, clinical practices vary, outcomes are seldom measured,
physicians are refractory to change and patients have ideas of their own which do not
coincide with either existing practices, nor academic guidelines. Some patients conclude
that the existing medical system is so far off the mark that they walk away vowing never
to go back unless they are in a car accident and have no choice. Many
Doctors are discouraged and face an increasingly difficult if not impossible task
of following numerous guidelines, and trying to satisfy too many
stakeholders, often with conflicting interests -patients,
insurers, employers, government agencies, and professional peers and overseers. Online recertification for cpr and standard first aid kits online gift cards
Doctors are understandably interested in objective evidence and want test results to
confirm their diagnoses. However, most pathophysiological processes remain obscure
and are genuinely difficult to measure, characterize and understand. Most medical
technology addresses the needs of a few well-defined diseases. The specification of
coronary artery disease, for example, can be precise and is a tribute to the combined
effort of physicians, technicians, engineers and equipment manufacturers to fully reveal a
pathophysiological process. The precision of these well-defined areas of medical concern
may mislead the unwary into thinking that all areas of medicine are equally well-defined
or can be well-defined with just a little more effort. Lots of roulette betting techniques were created to improve the chances in roulette casino game.
Common syndromes are diagnosed on clinical grounds often with no objective evidence
whatsoever. While the history of migraine headaches is distinctive and an astute clinician
will have no difficulty making the diagnosis on history, the emergency room physician will
have trouble deciding if a patient with a migraine story is really suffering or simply
wants a narcotic drug. The diagnosis of depression is another subjective syndrome that
requires a historical understanding more than X-Rays or abnormal lab tests. The irritable
bowel syndrome is a diagnosis of exclusion. The patient may suffer a great deal but tests
are negative repeatedly.
Medical practice is now under scrutiny from many directions. The idea of practice
guidelines and problem-solving algorithms have been around for many years, but now are the
subject of heated debate. Many scholars have realized that research findings do not get
incorporated into medical practice - indeed with the proliferation of information, there
is less formal direction in the selection and application of knowledge. Most astute
observers will notice that medical practice goes with fads and fashions. The most
important problems such as the effect of food and the environment on human health are
usually ignored in medical practice.
Pragmatic, primary medicine is especially difficult because of the wide-range of
disorders that present in all stages of manifestation. The primary physician must deal
with patients with common syndromes, lacking objective specification, with early illness
that may eventually become well defined, with in-between illnesses mingled with injuries,
infections, addictions and psychosocial problems. Patients are often demanding and often
have unrealistic expectations. The are ample reasons for physicians and patients alike to
become dissatisfied with their traditional relationship and as the century comes to a close
a critical re-evaluation is medicine is taking place. Old assumptions are often revealed
to be inadequate or wrong, with a few exceptions, the value of drug therapy is often
limited and the results of clinical trials are often contradictory or confusing.
A shift from category diagnosis to understanding the process underlying
diseases is
helpful to understand the patient, but is often not acceptable to agencies who pay the
medical bills. The insistence on a disease category works against understanding disease;
everyone wants to know what this is called and not where it came from and how to prevent
it from happening. A patient with 80% coronary artery blockage gets the best treatment in
our system; a single mother with a food-related illness may be living on welfare because she is too
sick to work, but she gets little understanding and no technology is applied to solving
her health problem. She remains on welfare and because two of her three children
develop a similar chronic illness, the family's future is bleak.
Despite the most impressive growth in biological knowledge and biotechnology, health
care costs continue to grow, death from cancers continues unchanged, bacteria
continue to develop antibiotic resistance, HIV continues to spread, environmental
degradation continues, alcohol and drug abuse remain major societal problems, violence
increases, the climate changes erratically with costly devastation from floods, fires,
winds and drought.
While people live longer in North America, there is growing evidence that the wellness
quotient of the average citizen deteriorates and the prospect of chronic degenerative
disease haunts the aging population. It is easy to point to persisting, increasing,
debilitating health problems such as depression, family violence, suicide, obesity,
diabetes, disability from degenerative diseases, dementias, cancer and an increasing
incidence of ill-defined illnesses. Close to 50% of the adult population in the US and
Canada report chronic symptoms such as headache, fatigue and joint or muscle pain. Aging
citizens are vulnerable to a variety of debilitating if not tragic illnesses. The rising
incidence of two disabling and chronic illnesses Diabetes and Alzheimer's dementia is a
major concern especially as a wave of 70 million "Baby Boomers" in North America
will approach the peak and increasing incidence of these diseases in the next 30 years.
Stephen J.
Gislason MD